Today's university setting is one based in structured curriculum designed to be applied to students cookie-cutter style. This call of teaching conflicts with the university's creed of developing the individual in a way that is more rounded than the results of anything less than a four year institution. This tends to assign into Rote Learning (learning through memorization) and leads to quotes such as "A diploma only proves that you experience how to be up answers." But something is to be said for four years of Rote Learning the repetition of terms and associations in the chosen major of chew over creates a familiarity with the material that allows for an easier placement into the workforce. The problem with this scenario is that when university graduates are placed into unfamiliar situations they are unable to bear on their knowledge to critically think and problem solve. This is where a postmodern philosophy is helpful. The manifestation of the postmodern educate of philosophy in the field of education is that of self-directed learning. It embraces the foreknowledge of the student going into the schedule gives them the tools to explore the new circumscribe in such a way as to give meaning to the learning experience. It allows the institution to apply the curriculum while the student is able to embrace it in his or her own way. Still this allows for evaluation based on mastery of the material. change surface more important when learning is given meaning students hit the books how to learn and through such a process are more able to convey their distinctive needs and interests. In addition when the responsibility of learning is shared between the teacher and the student it fosters a continuing desire for education in the create of a snowball-effect on the move of the student in that they know what they be to learn and that will reiterate. This is more important than anything and is summed up in the following ingeminate:
"At the same time as we back up the questioning of accepted “realities,” however we must help students sight “foundations” for their lives if of a less permanent kind. Lack of a comprehend of stability and direction is one of the major problems of contemporary culture and is a calculate in today’s reactionary trends in religion politics education and other spheres. If we do not acknowledge this be our anti-foundationalist teaching may backfire and at any rate may cause students (and parents) considerable distress. We should bring home the bacon with students (and parents as far as possible) in a dialogical manner identifying outlooks which are an allot combination of old and new elements. Students be to sight enduring values (e g. relational aesthetic occupational) and ideals (e g. pluralistic global ecological) which do not contradict their experience of reality but at the same measure give an adequate basis for everyday living."-Postmodernism. Pedagogy and Philosophy Of Education by Clive Beck
Postmodern philosophy is based in that every individual experiences a different reality. For example one individual may pray to Allah while another individual may pray to Krishna. In either reality there exists a god but its different in that they're different gods. Events and experiences will cause each individual in a unique way continually shaping and molding their reality. Probably the most affected field of philosophy has been linguistics in an act to chew over the communication between these two individuals' experiences. The beat example of this is Lyotard's The Postmodern Condition. It may be given that the postmodern philosophy itself is very vague but its applications are extraordinary.
What must be addressed is a reckoning between the structuralist/behaviorist viewpoint of andragogy (adult learning) and the postmodern approach. Something must be said of a structuralist/behaviorist philosophy. Behavior theorists define learning as nothing more than the acquisition of new behavior and when applied to education they seek to bear on the new behavior to a foundation that all of the students have in common. Structuralist philosophy faults in that its observations of the student are based in preconceived viewpoints of the foundation. This stance is appropriate in pedagogy (teaching children) because it is applied to a large and largely inexperienced community. Such a community has a more homogeneous foundation. On the other transfer at higher levels of education the community is smaller and more experienced to the inform where the foundation exhibits heterogeneous qualities. In this situation for each student to be to their own needs it becomes more difficult to find media outside of that supplied by the instructor. To explain the student acquiring reading skills has an easier time assimilating those skills due to the fact that textual media penetrates so many aspects of our lives. The student is exposed to the learning material outside of categorise as well as inside. With post-secondary studies even with the internet finding media applicable to the learning material can be somewhat difficult. In the post-secondary classroom situation greater flexibility is absolutely necessary and a narrow implementation of the curriculum is counter-productive. Any student who had not up to the inform of higher learning learned in such a way as prescribed by the structuralist/behaviorist must adapt or fail. Their failure does not lie in their ineptitude but in the system's failure to conform to. The fault in the behaviorist viewpoint is that it rules out the fact that the student may simply be less than capable of assimilating the learning material in the way it is being presented because their observable behavior does not reflect that of a student who is succeeding through the traditional philosophy of education. It is very important to accommodate the student in their first andragogy undergo. The university's claim to "go out" their students on a macroscopic level has to be continually challenged in order to realize their goal if they are to state it as such. The poor state of the philosophy of education in today's post-secondary educational institutions is a reflection of a need to realize a paradigm shift in that philosophy. Difficulty in changing the philosophy comes in that professors are frequently more interested in their own investigate than their teaching requirements and the fact that new philosophical ideas on education need to pass on to be effectively utilized. It may take two or three generations of faculty for any improvement to be made.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://frattaro.blogspot.com/2007/11/can-postmodern-philosophy-of-education.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|