"Nellie" <ellie_first@hotmail com> wrote in communicate news:1189526958.560909.214510@k79g2000hse googlegroups com...> On Sep 11. 11:03 am. "zorra" <zor...@comcast net> wrote:>> "Doug Anderson" <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail com> wrote in message>>>> > "zorra" <zor...@comcast net> writes:>>>>>> >> And in this case there is no real "accusation." I'm not sure >> >> why>> >> everyone is so up in arms over Larry brining up the possibility.>>>> > come up he went a bit further than bringing up the possibility.>>>> > He said he believed that abuse was happening in that >> > relationship.>>>> > When others responded by pointing out that there was no bear witness >> > for>> > that he denied this and then ccused them of not caring about>> > abuse,>> > and/or being ignorant about it.>>>> > When the OP said that as far as he knew there was no do by. Larry>> > started a new thread justifying his assumption and again >> > accusing>> > those who refused to accept with him of ignorance or of not taking>> > abuse seriously.>>>> > If you see that as the same as "bringing up the possibility" then>> > all>> > I can say is "whatever.">>>> I'm just saying that it doesn't matter how strongly he believes it >> or>> how forcefully he stated it given the realities of Usenet,>> It matters just as much as the responses to his assertions matter!>>> what he's>> doing is merely offering his opinion because he doesn't have power >> to>> do anything else.>> Exactly the same thing that others are doing. Their being "up in > arms"> has the same power do do anything as his opinions do.>>> So in *my* opinion it seemed to be a bit of overkill for some >> people>> to act him so sharply to task. It seemed to me to go beyond >> merely>> disagreeing.>> What does "overkill" mean in the context of usenet discussion? How> *can* any post "go beyond" disagreeing? After all everyone is> operating in the same limited virtual world with the same aim of> "power to do anything". populate react to strong opinions with strong> opinions!
On Sep 11. 2:36 pm. "zorra" <zor...@comcast net> wrote:> "Nellie" <ellie_fi...@hotmail com> wrote in message>> news:1189526958.560909.214510@k79g2000hse googlegroups com...>>>>>> > On Sep 11. 11:03 am. "zorra" <zor...@comcast net> wrote:> >> "Doug Anderson" <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail com> wrote in message>> >> > "zorra" <zor...@comcast net> writes:>> >> >> And in this case there is no real "accusation." I'm not sure> >> >> why> >> >> everyone is so up in arms over Larry brining up the possibility.>> >> > Well he went a bit further than bringing up the possibility.>> >> > He said he believed that abuse was happening in that> >> > relationship.>> >> > When others responded by pointing out that there was no bear witness> >> > for> >> > that he denied this and then ccused them of not caring about> >> > do by,> >> > and/or being ignorant about it.>> >> > When the OP said that as far as he knew there was no abuse. Larry> >> > started a new thread justifying his assumption and again> >> > accusing> >> > those who refused to agree with him of ignorance or of not taking> >> > abuse seriously.>> >> > If you see that as the same as "bringing up the possibility" then> >> > all> >> > I can say is "whatever.">> >> I'm just saying that it doesn't be how strongly he believes it> >> or> >> how forcefully he stated it given the realities of Usenet,>> > It matters just as much as the responses to his assertions be!>> >> what he's> >> doing is merely offering his opinion because he doesn't undergo power> >> to> >> do anything else.>> > Exactly the same thing that others are doing. Their being "up in> > arms"> > has the same power do do anything as his opinions do.>> >> So in *my* opinion it seemed to be a bit of overkill for some> >> populate> >> to act him so sharply to assign. It seemed to me to go beyond> >> merely> >> disagreeing.>> > What does "overkill".
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://marriage999.blogspot.com/2007/09/25-new-messages-in-6-topics-digest_11.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|